Employee or Contractor? Classification for Charities

A programme coordinator works three days a week, uses your laptop, reports to your executive director and invoices you monthly. Whatever the contract says, that arrangement has a status under the Income Tax Act, and your organisation carries the cost of getting it wrong. Charities and nonprofits land here often, because grant-funded roles are temporary and invoicing feels lighter than payroll. This guide sets out how CRA decides, how to ask, and what changes in your books either way.

Why does the label on the contract not settle it?

Because the facts of the working relationship as a whole decide the status. A contract is evidence of what the parties intended, and intention is only the first step of the analysis.

CRA is explicit that workers and payers can choose how they set up their affairs, but the status they choose has to reflect the actual working relationship. A document describing someone as an independent contractor does not make them one if everything about the arrangement says employee.

One note on sources before going further. CRA's guide RC4110, Employee or Self-employed, was the standard reference for years and has been cancelled; CRA's page now carries that label. The two-step approach and the factors survive on CRA's employment status pages under the Canada Pension Plan and employment insurance rulings section. A good deal of published Canadian material still cites the guide by number, so check what you are reading against the live pages.

The stakes are not symmetrical. If you treat an employee as a contractor, your organisation is the one assessed.

What is CRA's two-step approach?

First the parties' intention, then whether the facts match it. Both steps are needed, and the second one governs when they disagree.

In step one, CRA asks the worker and the payer what they intended when they entered the arrangement: a contract of service, meaning an employer and employee, or a contract for services, meaning a business relationship. Sometimes there is a common intent and it is written down. Sometimes the two sides understood it differently, and there is no common intent at all.

In step two, CRA asks questions about the working relationship and looks at whether the facts reflect the stated intention. Each element is considered separately and then together, and the conclusion is whichever description the actual working conditions fit.

Quebec runs on a three-step version, because status there is decided under the Civil Code. The factors are how the work is carried out, remuneration, and whether a relationship of subordination exists. Generally the province where the contract was formed decides which set of factors applies.

Which factors does CRA weigh?

Control, tools and equipment, subcontracting, financial risk, responsibility for investment and management, and opportunity for profit. No single factor decides it.

‍

‍

Two refinements matter in a charity setting. It is the payer's right to exercise control that counts, not whether the right is exercised, so a hands-off executive director does not turn an employee into a contractor. And control over the worker is the question, not control over the end result you bought.

Professionals complicate the control factor rather than settling it. An accountant or an IT consultant needs little direction because of their expertise, so CRA looks at the payer's influence over the worker as well as day-to-day direction.

There is a further point charities run into with related parties. Where an employee does not deal at arm's length with the employer, the employment may not be insurable, which is a separate question from whether the person is an employee.

How do you ask CRA for a ruling?

Either the worker or the payer can request one, and it settles the question for the period it covers. A ruling states whether the worker is an employee or self-employed, and whether the employment is pensionable or insurable.

You can request it through My Business Account as a payer, through My Account as a payer or worker, through a representative, or by completing Form CPT1 and sending it to your designated tax services office.

There is a time limit. A ruling has to be requested by 29 June of the year following the year in question, so employment in 2026 has to be raised by 29 June 2027, with the next business day applying where that falls on a weekend.

A ruling applies to specified periods of employment and is final unless it is appealed. If either party disagrees, the appeal goes in within 90 days of being notified, using Form CPT100 for a ruling or Form CPT101 for a payroll assessment.

Ask before the relationship has run for years, not after an assessment arrives. The ruling is free, the reassessment is not, and questions about borderline arrangements are the kind we take on our FAQ page.

What does the answer change in your books?

Which accounts the payments sit in, which slip goes out, and how the person appears on your annual return. The classification is visible in your financial statements whether or not you meant it to be.

An employee runs through payroll: wages, employer contributions, source deductions withheld and remitted, and a T4 at year end. The cost sits in compensation, and for a registered charity it forms part of the total reported on Schedule 3.

A self-employed contractor invoices you. The cost sits in professional and consulting fees, which for a registered charity completing the detailed financial schedule is line 4860, no source deductions are withheld, and fees for services above $500 in a calendar year are reportable in box 048 of the T4A. Contractors do not appear on Schedule 3 at all.

The contractor file is part of the evidence. Keep the invoices, the contract, the business number, and where the contractor is a registrant, the GST or HST charged and their registration number. An invoice with no business identity behind it is a weak answer to a classification question.

That gives you a useful cross-check at year end. The compensation figure on your schedule should agree with your payroll records, and anyone paid for their work who appears in neither place is a classification question you have not answered yet. 

Keeping payroll and contractor payments reconciled month by month, rather than untangling them in March, is the routine side of this work, and it is what ongoing charity bookkeeping is for. 

Grant-funded roles allocate the same way regardless. A salary charged across three funders is still one salary reported once, and the allocation basis is a separate exercise from the classification.

What does getting it wrong cost?

Both shares of the contributions and premiums, plus penalties and interest. An employer that fails to deduct the required amounts has to pay the employee's share as well as its own.

That is the direct cost. The indirect one is that a reassessment usually covers more than one year and more than one person, because the arrangement that was wrong for the coordinator was probably wrong for the two people hired the same way.

The pattern to watch for in a small organisation is drift. Someone is engaged for a short defined project, invoicing monthly, and three years later they have an email address, a desk, set hours and a role in the team. Nothing was decided; the facts simply changed underneath the paperwork.

Review the arrangement when the facts change rather than at renewal. If the answer is now employee, moving the person onto payroll from a clean date is a smaller problem than being found later, and limited assistance setting payroll up in QuickBooks Online or Gusto is part of what our scope of service covers.

One boundary. This is the tax test for Canada Pension Plan, employment insurance and income tax purposes. Whether the person is an employee for employment standards or labour law purposes is a separate question with its own test, and it belongs with a lawyer. 

For the legal side of engaging staff and contractors, including how the agreement itself is drafted, see our sister site for charity and nonprofit legal guidance.

Our note on common pitfalls covers the bookkeeping consequences, and the account structure that keeps the two populations apart is a chart of accounts question.

Frequently Asked Questions

Our contract says independent contractor. Is that enough?

No. The contract is evidence of intention, which is the first step. The facts of the working relationship decide the answer, and they govern where the two disagree.

The person works for three organisations. Does that make them a contractor?

It is one indicator among several. Being free to work when and for whom they choose points toward self-employment, but CRA weighs control, tools, subcontracting, financial risk, investment and opportunity for profit together.

Can we treat a coordinator as a contractor because the grant only funds one year?

The length of the funding does not decide the status. A fixed-term employee is still an employee, and the working relationship is what CRA examines.

Where did guide RC4110 go?

It has been cancelled. CRA's employment status pages under the Canada Pension Plan and employment insurance rulings section carry the current version of the two-step approach and the factors.

Who can request a ruling, and by when?

Either the worker or the payer, by 29 June of the year following the year in question. A ruling covers specified periods and is final unless appealed within 90 days.

Does the answer change how we allocate a grant-funded position?

No. Allocation across funders and across functional expenditure lines happens the same way. What changes is the slip, the source deductions and which expenditure account the cost sits in.

This article covers worker classification for Canadian charities and nonprofits as at September 2026, following CRA's employment status pages. Guide RC4110 has been cancelled and should not be relied on. Employment standards status is a separate legal question. A CPP and EI ruling is the only way to settle a borderline case with CRA.